At Enade, an invitation was raised that Chile needs to pick up: investing in people, in knowledge, and in the future. If we want to recover growth and make a leap in productivity, there is an unavoidable question: Are we preparing the new generations to lead that development? In Chile, the school system and the world of work have been divorced
For millennia, humanity solved a complex problem: transforming a dependent child into an adult capable of navigating the world on their own. It did so without manuals or adults organizing every single minute of childhood. Today, we have more information about child development than ever before, and yet, parenting seems increasingly difficult.
A few weeks ago, Anthropic—one of the world’s most advanced companies in artificial intelligence—published a paper titled *When AI Builds Itself* that explains that Claude, its most advanced model, already autonomously writes more than 80% of the code that goes into production. What began as a tool to assist programmers no longer needs humans to generate its own successor. What’s
On April 10, 2026, China launched its AI + Education plan. The announcement is not aimed at incorporating more technology into classrooms, but rather at redefining how it will educate its citizens: building the capacity to understand, develop, and govern artificial intelligence as the cornerstone of a new form of economic, social, and geopolitical power. It is not just about
Women’s empowerment has been one of the most profound cultural shifts in Western societies in recent decades. While this process has gained prominence in public discourse, another transformation is taking place with less visibility: that of men and their place in this new social order.
Today, it costs $130 to hack a Facebook account, $162 to hack a Gmail account, and $500 to hack a corporate email account (BCG, 2025). When crimes have reference prices, segmented supply, and tailor-made services, we are no longer dealing with a technical problem, but with an established illicit market that is not sustained by lone hackers, but by criminal organizations
The curriculum change promoted by this government is at a decisive moment. Its eventual rejection would not only be an administrative setback, but also a worrying sign of our difficulty in understanding that technology is no longer an external tool, but a contemporary way of thinking that redefines how we learn, produce, and participate in society.
The emergence of generative artificial intelligence is eroding the gateway to first jobs, and there is evidence to support this. In the US, companies that adopted AI reduced junior hiring by 22% and increased senior hiring.
Presidential programs are replete with promises about pensions, crime or growth, but they make a troubling omission: The future. I am not talking about a philosophical abstraction or a slogan, but as a category of urgent and concrete political action. Where are the plans that address the tsunami of artificial intelligence, the unstoppable climate change, the inescapable population aging or the global productive reconfiguration; how to design public policies that, with an eye beyond, allow us to take advantage of the emerging opportunities and mitigate the risks that are already upon us?
